EDEXCEL GCSE HISTORY · PAPER 1 · CRIME & PUNISHMENT
Crime and Punishment in Norman England
1066-c1200 · Chapter 1: Crime and punishment in medieval England, 1066-c1200 · Lesson 2 of 4
Starter: Anglo-Saxon Recap
Pair each term with its meaning.
|
Term |
Meaning |
|---|---|
|
Tithing Ten men responsible for each other |
|
|
Hue and cry The village chases the suspect |
|
|
Wergild Compensation paid to the victim's family |
|
|
Oath-helpers Neighbours who swore to your character |
|
|
Ordeal Letting God decide guilt |
Learning Objectives
1. Explain why William I needed to control a hostile Anglo-Saxon population.
2. Describe the new crimes and punishments the Normans introduced, including the Forest Laws and the murdrum fine.
3. Explain the continuity in Norman law enforcement, and assess how much changed after 1066.
Setting the Scene
In 1066 William of Normandy won the Battle of Hastings, but around 10,000 Normans now had to rule about two million English people who resented them. Rebellions followed, and William crushed them brutally in the Harrying of the North (1069-70). His laws were designed to protect his power and his followers.
1066 - Battle of Hastings: William becomes king. | 1069-70 - Harrying of the North: rebellion crushed by laying waste to the land. | 1079 - The New Forest is created as a royal hunting forest. | 1086 - The Domesday Book records who holds the land - and owes the king service. | 1166 - Henry II's Assize of Clarendon strengthens royal justice.
The Feudal System
Crime against your lord was now a crime against the whole structure of power.
|
The king |
Owned all the land; granted it in return for loyalty |
|
Barons and bishops |
Held land from the king; supplied knights |
|
Knights |
Held land from barons; fought when called |
|
Peasants |
Worked the land; owed labour and obedience to their lord |
What Changed and What Stayed the Same
|
CONTINUITY FROM THE ANGLO-SAXONS |
NORMAN CHANGES |
|
▸ Tithings and the hue and cry still made communities police themselves. ▸ Hundred and shire courts still heard most cases. ▸ Trial by ordeal continued, run by the Church. ▸ Stocks, pillory, fines and execution were all still used. |
▸ The Forest Laws created new crimes on royal land. ▸ The murdrum fine punished a hundred for a Norman's murder. ▸ Trial by combat was introduced. ▸ Wergild ended: fines went to the king, not the victim's family. |
The Forest Laws
|
William declared large areas of England, including the New Forest, to be royal forest. People who had lived there for generations were suddenly criminals for doing what they had always done. What became a crime ▸ Hunting. Killing deer or boar on royal land - poaching. ▸ Everyday life. Cutting wood, grazing animals or carrying a bow in the forest. ▸ Harsh penalties. Poaching a deer could be punished by blinding or mutilation. ▸ A social crime. Most people did not see poaching as really wrong, so many helped poachers. |
Royal forests covered a large part of England by 1200. |
Medieval manuscript illustration; public domain copies on Wikimedia Commons.
Case Study
|
CASE STUDY The Murdrum Fine Normans were being killed by resentful English people, and the killers were hard to find because locals protected each other. William's answer was the murdrum fine: if a Norman was found murdered and the killer was not handed over, the whole hundred where the body lay had to pay a very large fine. It used the Anglo-Saxon idea of collective responsibility, but turned it into a way of protecting the conquerors. |
|
Hundred The area that paid if the killer was not produced |
1066-1340 The murdrum fine stayed in use for nearly 300 years |
Punishment Under the Normans
The Normans made punishment serve the king.
▸ Wergild ends. Fines were now paid to the king rather than to the victim's family, so crime became an offence against royal authority.
▸ More capital crimes. Execution was used more, especially for crimes against the king such as rebellion.
▸ Mutilation. William preferred mutilation to execution for many crimes: blinding and castration were used, partly to show that offenders still had time to repent.
▸ Trial by combat. The accuser and accused fought, often to the death, until one gave in. The loser was hanged if he survived.
Law Enforcement and Courts
The machinery barely changed, but the authority behind it did.
▸ Sheriffs. The sheriff became more powerful, collecting fines and taxes and bringing criminals to court for the king.
▸ Church courts. William created separate Church courts, which dealt with clergy and moral crimes.
▸ Henry II. The Assize of Clarendon (1166) sent royal judges round the country and used juries of local men to report suspects, and ordered new gaols to be built.
▸ Castles. Around 500 castles built by 1100 were a constant reminder of Norman power.
How Much Did 1066 Change?
Place each development on the line.
CONTINUITY ——▸ CHANGE
1. Tithings and hue and cry. Unchanged: communities still policed themselves
2. Trial by ordeal. Unchanged, though now alongside combat
3. Courts and sheriffs. Same system, more royal control
4. Punishments. Wergild gone; fines to the king
5. Forest Laws and murdrum. Brand new crimes to protect Norman power
The Big Idea
The Normans changed who justice served more than how it worked.
The tithing, the hue and cry and the ordeal all survived - but now they protected the king and the conquerors.
Key Terms
|
Forest Laws Laws making hunting and gathering wood on royal land a crime. |
Poaching Illegally hunting animals on land that belonged to someone else. |
|
Social crime A crime most people do not think is really wrong, such as poaching. |
Murdrum fine A fine on a whole hundred if a Norman was murdered and the killer not found. |
|
Trial by combat The accuser and accused fought to decide guilt. |
Feudal system Land held from the king in return for loyalty and service. |
|
Assize of Clarendon Henry II's law of 1166 that strengthened royal justice. |
|
Summary
✓ William needed to control a hostile population, so his laws protected Norman power.
✓ New crimes: the Forest Laws and the murdrum fine.
✓ Tithings, the hue and cry and trial by ordeal continued.
✓ Wergild ended - fines now went to the king.
|
EXAM FOCUS "The Norman Conquest brought major changes to crime and punishment in England." How far do you agree? (16 marks) Argue both sides with specific examples, then judge: continuity in methods, change in whose authority they served. |